Test Code Sm Smith (Sm) Antibodies, IgG, Serum
Reporting Name
Sm Ab, IgG, SUseful For
Evaluating patients with clinical features suggestive of antinuclear antibody associated connective tissue disease and the confirmation of a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Testing for Smith antibodies is not useful in patients without demonstrable antinuclear antibodies.
Performing Laboratory
Mayo Clinic Laboratories in RochesterSpecimen Type
SerumSpecimen Required
Collection Container/Tube:
Preferred: Serum gel
Acceptable: Red top
Submission Container/Tube: Plastic vial
Specimen Volume: 0.5 mL
Collection Instructions: Centrifuge and aliquot serum into a plastic vial.
Specimen Minimum Volume
0.35 mL
Specimen Stability Information
Specimen Type | Temperature | Time | Special Container |
---|---|---|---|
Serum | Refrigerated (preferred) | 21 days | |
Frozen | 21 days |
Special Instructions
Reference Values
<1.0 U (negative)
≥1.0 U (positive)
Reference values apply to all ages.
Day(s) Performed
Monday through Saturday
Test Classification
This test has been cleared, approved, or is exempt by the US Food and Drug Administration and is used per manufacturer's instructions. Performance characteristics were verified by Mayo Clinic in a manner consistent with CLIA requirements.CPT Code Information
86235
LOINC Code Information
Test ID | Test Order Name | Order LOINC Value |
---|---|---|
SM | Sm Ab, IgG, S | 18323-6 |
Result ID | Test Result Name | Result LOINC Value |
---|---|---|
SM | Sm Ab, IgG, S | 18323-6 |
Interpretation
A positive anti-Smith antibody result in the appropriate clinical context is consistent with a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Clinical Reference
1. Tan EM, Kunkel HG. Characteristics of a soluble nuclear antigen precipitating with sera of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. 1966;96(3):464-471
2. Zieve GW, Khusial PR. The anti-Sm immune response in autoimmunity and cell biology. Autoimmun Rev. 2003;2(5):235-240
3. Billings PB, Hoch SO. Characterization of U small nuclear RNA-associated proteins. J Biol Chem. 1984;259(20):12850-12856
4. Battle DJ, Kasim M, Yong J, et al. The SMN complex: an assembly machine for RNPs. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2006;71:313-320
5. Aringer M, Costenbader K, Daikh D, et al. 2019 European League Against Rheumatism/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(9):1400-1412
6. van Beers JJBC, Schreurs MWJ. Anti-Sm antibodies in the classification criteria of systemic lupus erythematosus. J Transl Autoimmun. 2022;5:100155
7. Migliorini P, Baldini C, Rocchi V, Bombardieri S. Anti-Sm and anti-RNP antibodies. Autoimmunity. 2005;38(1):47-54
8. Kwon OC, Park MC. Risk of systemic lupus erythematosus flares according to autoantibody positivity at the time of diagnosis. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):3068
9. Llorente MJ, Jimenez J, Gonzalez C, et al. Effectiveness of different methods for anti-Sm antibody identification. A multicentre study. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2005;43(7):748-752
Report Available
1 to 3 daysMethod Name
Multiplex Flow Immunoassay